Would you support a law, which has been proposed in an increasing number of cities, that would make the wearing of saggy or low-slung pants indecent exposure?
November 1, 2007
“No. But I think how you dress impacts how people view you.”
— Frank Billar - Boston
“There should be limits. I have seen [an instance] where a person should have been arrested for indecent exposure because he was indecently exposed — it was beyond saggy. A little sag, a little underwear, I don’t see that as a problem, but showing your butt is a problem.”
— Ken Mathews - Billerica
“I would be in favor of [such a law]. It’s more than just because I don’t like how it looks; it’s a statement — a rude statement, at the very least. I work in construction, and it is not something that would ever be allowed at a construction site for safety reasons. As a social statement, I don’t want anyone looking at America from any distance and thinking that’s what we are.”
— Pete Burnett - Seekonk
“I definitely would not support that [law]. You should be allowed to wear what you want to wear; it is an expression of yourself. As long as you’re not showing anything inappropriate, I don’t think [such a law should be enacted].”
— Hilary Stinnett - Boston








Comments
Got something to say?